How Internet TV Delivers Real News

images (2)Vast majority of independent journalists all over the globe are offering their projects to online TVs. This is becoming the trend just lately, especially now that this medium continues to be recognized by a lot of people. Online TVs offer a great platform for freelancers since they broadcast TV online for the whole planet that’s why the journalists can tap stories from all regions in the world even in their local languages.

The internet TVs then air the work perhaps as live tv or keep them in archives to be viewed by demand by internet tv watchers. One of the primary reasons behind providing direct internet tv is to handle seriously vulnerable reports that terrestrial TVs dare not to air for the general population as a result of political or security consequences involved. This situation is very normal in almost any country around the world. The reports may perhaps be revealing government conspiracy, terrorists, drug trafficking, corruption by high ranked officials and a lot of other remarkably vulnerable stories.

 

Changes in the News Media

user_images_file_name_3262The Changing News Media

Thanks to political changes and to the growth of the Internet, it’s no secret that news sources have had to radically change their operating procedures and business models to adapt to a rapidly changing audience climate. Those interested in discussions about the state of the current news media are fond of noting that, at one time, news departments at major United States television networks were, proudly, “loss leaders,” meaning that they operated at a net loss, making no money. The networks were willing to cover this loss with profits from other departments because news was important, and they were fulfilling the crucial social function of keeping the public informed about current events. To a certain degree, this state of affairs was even legislated, since news outlets were required to provide a certain proportion of real, objective reporting alongside their more sensationalist stories.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996

Over the past few decades, broadcast media, including television news programs and networks, have been changing drastically. The changes have largely taken the form of deregulation, including, for example, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which deregulated media ownership, leading to the current state of affairs wherein a few huge corporations own a vast majority of the broadcast media outlets to which the general public has access. Additionally, news outlets are now able to carry as much tabloid-style news as they like, and are under no obligation to provide objective reporting or to cater to what the public ought to hear.

Where is the Real News Media?

No matter which side of the debate is in the right, the question that arises is this: do people even have a choice in the matter? Do people choose to watch sensationalistic, fad news when they could be watching “real” news? Does real news even exist anymore? Or has deregulation left a void of information that still remains to be filled with a new, responsible news source that’s simultaneously savvy to the changing technological climate? It’s not clear whether people would choose good news if they could, but what is clear is that there’s a glut of entertainment news outlets. Perhaps a higher proportion of socially responsible news outlets would change the landscape once again.

News for Profit

The effect of deregulation can be seen every day across news media. Dedicated news networks are notorious for tailoring the news they offer to specific target audiences, giving every story they run a blatant political spin and choosing to air only news items that fit with their audience’s worldview. News programs on major networks such as CBS and NBC are no longer loss leaders, but are instead designed to make a profit by getting ratings, meaning that they often run sensationalistic news stories or use language and visuals that are flashy, exaggerated, and intended to catch the attention of an ever-more-restless public. On the internet, this type of news reporting is even more apparent: there are websites dedicated to providing only the news that visitors want to know, with nothing that they don’t want. Even formerly respectable news outlets, such as newspapers, frequently run sub-par pieces on their websites just so they can get as many viewers, and thus as much ad revenue, as possible.

The Case for Deregulation

In recent years, there has been a great deal of debate related to whether the changing news media is a good thing. Those in favor tend to be proponents of free-market capitalism and deregulation, arguing that news outlets ought to be able to give the public what they want in order to compete and make a profit. Such people argue that if the public isn’t interested in “important” news, such as current world events or political developments, no one has the right to force such information upon them. Free market fanatics claim that the market is itself a regulatory body, and the onus is upon news outlets to make news both important and profitable.

 

Latest Politics News in Real Time-Influentials Network Style

The almost government shutdown had been hogging the news, but you might have found more news on other important current political stories and faster on newsInfluential Network. If you want to know what’s happening in US Politics and current political news, then Influential Network will tell you – at least the ten most important at that time. It’s an automated news tracking and filtering service, known in the trade as a “news aggregator”. It provides headlines, social media and news links updated every few minutes. The founder and publisher, Terry Lee, says it’s all done in software with some human interference and oversight. Sites like Google which follows links and assesses content can be embarrassingly slow in its broad coverage and takes a long time to develop, so Google News can run hours or even a day behind a site like Influential Network. This is fine for casual consumers, but if you’re a latest political news junkie – or a legislative aide, work in public affairs, or a lobbyist – it’s hopeless. Some complain that there are two major problems with Influential Network: it doesn’t cover many topics, and it doesn’t cover much of the world. So far, Influential Network only covers political and politics news. And the sites mainly cover the national and local US political news. But if you’re interested in current political news from Europe or Japan, Africa, etc., it’s the wrong place to go.

Fortunately, a lot of news today is of global interest and a tool like Influential Network would be welcomed around the globe. Influential Networks does have plans to address at least one of those complaints. Leveraging its unique set of aggregation algorithmic codes, Influential Network will be able to develop local content sites within its existing platform that will allow it to duplicate its formula to create and publish international sites beginning with Europe, Japan, and South Africa starting in fall 2011.

For now, Influential’s Network is concentrating is perfecting its technology and establishing its brands in the US political news space. It hopes to become to go-to site for the non-political news consumer, who needs a politics cliff notes before heading into a meeting or to impress a date, to the political insiders who want the latest trending political news in real time. The DC-based start-up thinks it can meet the needs and desires of the entire range of political news consumers by doing what it does best – finding and filtering the most Latest political news before everyone else.